Skip to content
Sign in Create account
Features Watch the league

Watching North America and Europe 12 leagues

Atlanta Firebirds

Founded 1968 in Atlanta

Peachtree Dome, holding 10 000

⁠
The season in three lines

The four factors

The four things that decide a basketball game, after Dean Oliver: shooting (effective field goal %, which counts a three as one and a half), turnovers (the share of trips thrown away), rebounds (the share of own misses won back) and free throws (tries per shot). The bars show each club against the other, and the club page shows it against the league.

They add up to the margin: the report's three cards are the factors that moved the score most, in points.

Work on the factor the card calls costly: ball handlers and the tempo for turnovers, bigs for rebounds, drivers for the line.

See all terms

Weakness

Weak on the glass

21.2 %

Atlanta Firebirds win back 21.2 % of their misses. The league wins back 25.9 %. That is 30th of 30.

ATL 21.2 %
League 25.9 %
How we counted it
Atlanta Firebirds: 76 ÷ (76 + 282)21.2 %
League mean, 30 clubs25.9 %
Rank, 30 clubs30th of 30
Strength

Plenty of trips to the line

34.2

Atlanta Firebirds attempt 34.2 free throws per 100 shots. The league attempts 30.5, so 7th of 30.

ATL 34.2 %
League 30.5 %
How we counted it
Atlanta Firebirds: 242 tries ÷ 708 shots34.2 %
League mean, 30 clubs30.5 %
Rank, 30 clubs7th of 30
Weakness

A thin attack

122.1

Atlanta Firebirds score 122.1 points for every 100 trips. The league scores 125.6. That is 22nd of 30.

ATL 122.1
League 125.6
How we counted it
100 × 1 001 points ÷ 820 possessions122.1
League mean, 30 clubs125.6
Rank, 30 clubs22nd of 30
Best shot-maker

Vlajko Radisavljević

#38 · PG

31/55shots
78points
+13.9vs expected
How we counted it
31 made of 55, 16 of them threes31/55
Points: 2 × 31 + 1678
His shots are worth (expected)64.1
Above expected78 − 64.1 = +13.9 adds up

Four factors

Shootingeffective field goal % · 16th of 30
ATL 57.9 %
League 58.3 %
How we counted it
Atlanta Firebirds: (352 + ½ × 116) ÷ 70857.9 %
League mean, 30 clubs58.3 %
Rank, 30 clubs16th of 30
Turnoverstrips lost, fewer is better · 12th of 30
ATL 12.9 %
League 13.6 %
How we counted it
Atlanta Firebirds: 106 ÷ 820 possessions12.9 %
League mean, 30 clubs13.6 %
Rank, 30 clubs12th of 30
Reboundsown misses won back · 30th of 30
ATL 21.2 %
League 25.9 %
How we counted it
Atlanta Firebirds: 76 ÷ (76 + 282)21.2 %
League mean, 30 clubs25.9 %
Rank, 30 clubs30th of 30
Free throwstries per shot · 7th of 30
ATL 34.2 %
League 30.5 %
How we counted it
Atlanta Firebirds: 242 tries ÷ 708 shots34.2 %
League mean, 30 clubs30.5 %
Rank, 30 clubs7th of 30

⁠
Lucky or unlucky?

Shot-making

Points scored from the floor minus the points those shots are worth. Above zero is shooting better than the league does from the same shots, below zero is worse. Free throws are not shots and are not in it.

Over a night it is mostly luck, and the page calls it that: a few points either way is as expected. Over a season it settles, and a man far from zero is either a real finisher or a man whose luck will turn.

Rest or sharpen the man if it is persistently below zero; do not rebuild the attack on one hot night.

See all terms

As expected

Right on what the shots are worth

−4.4

Over 5 games Atlanta Firebirds's shots were worth 537.4 points and they scored 533 from the floor: 0.9 a game in line with what than the league would do from the same shots.

How we counted it
Points: 2 × 227 + 79533
Expected points, the squad's shots added up537.4
Shot-making−4.4
A game−0.89

Expected points are measured against league rates through round 13.

Atlanta Firebirds
Kind of shotShotsWorthPoints
Mid-range · Drive44 % of 383 league shots130.8911.5
Mid-range · Drive · second chanceonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 42 % of 61110.840.8
Mid-range · Drive · fast breakonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 42 % of 61110.840.8
Mid-range · Post-up41 % of 343 league shots100.828.2
Mid-range · Post-up · second chanceonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 41 % of 43830.812.4
Mid-range · Post-up · fast breakonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 41 % of 43820.811.6
Mid-range · Catch and shoot47 % of 426 league shots140.9313.1
Mid-range · Catch and shoot · second chanceonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 45 % of 55820.901.8
Mid-range · Catch and shoot · fast breakonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 45 % of 55820.901.8
Mid-range · Pull-up46 % of 968 league shots220.9120.0
Mid-range · Pull-up · second chanceonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 44 % of 1 31660.895.3
Mid-range · Pull-up · fast breakonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 44 % of 1 31650.894.4
Rim · Drive65 % of 2 289 league shots811.31106.1
Rim · Drive · second chance67 % of 262 league shots71.349.4
Rim · Drive · fast break68 % of 732 league shots191.3625.8
Rim · Drive · fast break · second chanceonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 66 % of 3 38011.321.3
Rim · Post-up65 % of 656 league shots271.3135.3
Rim · Post-up · second chanceonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 67 % of 82221.342.7
Rim · Post-up · fast breakonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 67 % of 82221.342.7
Rim · Catch and shoot67 % of 622 league shots181.3324.0
Rim · Catch and shoot · second chanceonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 68 % of 92981.3610.9
Rim · Catch and shoot · fast breakonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 68 % of 92951.366.8
Rim · Pull-up66 % of 322 league shots111.3214.6
Rim · Pull-up · second chanceonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 65 % of 48411.301.3
Rim · Pull-up · fast breakonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 65 % of 48441.305.2
Rim · Pull-up · fast break · second chanceonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 65 % of 48411.301.3
Three · Drive40 % of 351 league shots81.219.7
Three · Drive · fast breakonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 39 % of 52111.161.2
Three · Drive · fast break · second chanceonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 39 % of 52111.161.2
Three · Catch and shoot39 % of 3 419 league shots1091.17127.9
Three · Catch and shoot · second chance37 % of 449 league shots161.1117.8
Three · Catch and shoot · fast break36 % of 574 league shots211.0822.6
Three · Catch and shoot · fast break · second chanceonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 38 % of 4 53021.152.3
Three · Pull-up37 % of 854 league shots261.1128.8
Three · Pull-up · second chanceonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 38 % of 1 14231.133.4
Three · Pull-up · fast breakonly a few league shots like it, so the same play from the same zone: 38 % of 1 14231.133.4
Total adds up4581.17537.4

Shot quality is counted from the 5 games whose streams are stored, of 8 played.

More statsTrends, shot mix, the squad's shooters

Trends

Net rating

league 0 Round 1: +11 Round 3: −21 Round 4: −9 Round 6: +2 Round 7: +2 Round 9: −2 Round 12: −15 Round 13: +10

Offence

league 126 Round 1: 127 Round 3: 107 Round 4: 117 Round 6: 124 Round 7: 117 Round 9: 141 Round 12: 126 Round 13: 118

Shooting %

league 58 Round 1: 56 Round 3: 59 Round 4: 58 Round 6: 59 Round 7: 55 Round 9: 73 Round 12: 56 Round 13: 49

Dots are games, the line is the five-game mean, the dashed line is the league. All 8 games are counted.

Where the shots came from

RimMid-rangeThree
Atlanta Firebirds
41% 18% 41%
League
38% 20% 42%
DrivePost-upCatch and shootPull-up
Atlanta Firebirds
29% 10% 43% 18%
League
31% 9% 41% 20%
How we counted it
Atlanta Firebirds: drives + post-ups + catch and shoot + pull-ups133 drives + 46 post-ups + 197 catch and shoot + 82 pull-ups = 458

⁠
Best shot-makers

Expected points

The points the league gets from shots like this one this season: the zone, the play, whether it came on the break and whether it came on a second chance. It does not know who was guarding or how far out he stood, because the game records neither. A club's expected points are the sum over its shots, and every figure opens to the kinds of shot it is made of.

It is a measure, not a rule: nothing in a match depends on it. It tells shot selection (how good the shots were) apart from shot-making (what the men did with them), so a bad night reads as bad luck or bad shots rather than just a bad night.

Take more of the shots the league scores most from, the rim and the open three, and fewer long pull-ups; the tactics page moves shots between them.

See all terms

Vlajko Radisavljević PG Point guard Squad number 38 23 y
More about Vlajko Radisavljević Overall Strong61–80
Age
23
Potential
Elite (81–99)
Form
0.3
Contract ends
End of season 3
31/55 shots 64.1 expected 78 scored ▲ +13.9
Emanuel Davis SF Small forward Squad number 1 27 y
More about Emanuel Davis Overall Strong61–80
Age
27
Potential
Strong (61–80)
Form
0.2
Contract ends
End of season 4
38/71 shots 86.2 expected 86 scored ▼ −0.2
Frederick Cotton PF Power forward Squad number 36 24 y
More about Frederick Cotton Overall Strong61–80
Age
24
Potential
Strong (61–80)
Form
0.1
Contract ends
End of season 3
36/84 shots 99.2 expected 83 scored ▼ −16.2

A man is listed from 50 shots.